Apple iPhone X review: The future of iPhone
- < Prev
-
Page 3 of 3 - Benchmark Performance, Imaging, Battery life, and Conclusion
Page 3 of 3
- Next >
Benchmark Performance, Imaging, Battery life, and Conclusion
Benchmark Performance
Like the iPhone 8 and 8 Plus, the iPhone X uses Apple's new A11 Bionic processor, a hexa-core chip with two performance cores that are 25 percent faster than the A10, and four high-efficiency cores that the company says are 70 percent faster than the old model. There’s also a new Apple-designed GPU that’s 30 percent faster, with the same performance as the A10, but only consumes half the power.
Like the 8 Plus, the iPhone X has 3GB RAM. While that doesn't sound like much compared to the 6GB or even 8GB RAM we've started seeing on Android phones, smartphones really don't need that much RAM.
I mentioned this in my iPhone 8 review but it's worth repeating here: unlike a PC where opening a ton of browser tabs can severely slow down your computer, iOS and Android have automatic memory management that offloads inactive tabs from active RAM usage. While you can split-screen multitask on most smartphones, you're still generally limited to just two side-by-side windows, which limits the amount of RAM you require. Mobile games also tend to be optimized to only require 1 or 2GB of RAM, which is why we didn't see much performance improvement from phones with huge amounts of RAM like the 8GB OnePlus 5.
Apple iPhone X (256GB) | Apple iPhone 8 Plus (256GB) | Google Pixel 2 XL | Samsung Galaxy Note8 | OnePlus 5 (8GB RAM/128GB) | HTC U11 | Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 | |
Launch SRP |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Operating system |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Processor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Built-in Memory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Display |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Camera |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connectivity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage Type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Battery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dimensions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weight |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sunspider Javascript
SunSpider JavaScript measures the browsing performance of a device when processing JavaScript. It not only takes into consideration the underlying hardware performance, but also assesses how optimized a particular platform is at delivering a high-speed web browsing experience.
Apple has always performed really well on this benchmark due to how well optimized Safari is for Apple's processors and that trend continues with the X. Apple remains the only manufacturer to record sub-150 ms results in this benchmark! In terms of actual user experience, the web browsing experience on the X is lightning fast, smooth and lag-free.
Antutu
AnTuTu is an all-in-one benchmark that tests CPU, GPU, memory, and storage. The CPU benchmark evaluates both integer and floating-point performance, the GPU tests assess 2D and 3D performance, the memory test measures available memory bandwidth and latency, and the storage tests gauge the read and write speeds of a device's flash memory.
Surprisingly, the X scored a little higher than the 8 Plus, despite running on essentially identical specs. It's possible that the A11 was actually built with the X in mind, and is therefore slightly better optimized for it, or iOS 11.1 (which the X is running on) gives a slight performance boost over iOS 11 (which the 8 Plus is currently running on). When the iOS 11.1 update is available for the 8 Plus we'll re-test it to see if its score changes.
Both the 8 Plus and X were way ahead of all of our Android devices.
Basemark OS II
Basemark OS II is an all-in-one benchmarking tool that measures overall performance through a comprehensive suite of tests including system, internal and external memory, graphics, web browsing, and CPU consumption.
We saw the X pull even further ahead of the 8 Plus here. Once again no Android device even came close to Apple's scores.
3DMark Sling Shot
3DMark Sling Shot is an advanced 3D graphics benchmark that tests the full range of OpenGL ES 3.0 API features including multiple render targets, instanced rendering, uniform buffers and transform feedback. The test also includes impressive volumetric lighting and post-processing effects. We're running this benchmark in Unlimited mode, which ignores screen resolutions.
The X was once again dominant in this benchmark, and again posted a slightly better score than the 8 Plus.
GFXBench Manhattan
GFXBench Manhattan is a complex OpenGL ES 3.0-based test that uses a deferred shading graphics pipeline. The benchmark employs multiple render targets (MRTS) and diffuse and specular lighting calculated for more than 60 lights. The test also features cube map reflection and emission, triplanar mapping, instanced mesh rendering, and a Theora-based video playback system that leverages asynchronous texture streaming. We're running this test in Offscreen mode at 1080p to eliminate differences in screen resolution.
As we saw in Basemark OS II, the X once again scored significantly higher than the 8 Plus, making me wonder if Apple really did build the A11 with the X's architecture in mind. As usual, no Android device even came close to the X.
Imaging
Like the 8 Plus, the iPhone X has a dual rear camera system, only this time, both 12-megapixel cameras have OIS. The wide-angle lens is the same f/1.8 lens you'll find on the 8 Plus, but the telephoto lens is an upgraded f/2.4 shooter (the 8 Plus has an f/2.8 telephoto lens). The benefit of both lenses being optically stabilized is that there's now no downside to shooting in zoom mode.
Like the 8 Plus, you get Portrait Mode, as well as Portrait Lighting. Another nice benefit of the TrueDepth camera on the iPhone X is that the front camera now also supports Portrait Mode and Portrait Lighting.
Image quality from the X is excellent with natural colors, good contrast and sharp details across the image. Both the wide-angle and telephoto lens produce excellent results, although I personally can't see much difference between it and the 8 Plus.
Stay tuned for a full in-depth camera review of the iPhone X and how it compares to the competition - coming soon!
Battery Life
Our standard battery test for mobile phones has the following parameters:
- Looping a 720p video with screen brightness and volume at 100%
- Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity turned on
- Constant data streaming through email and Twitter
The iPhone X actually has the largest capacity battery out of the three 2017 iPhones, with a 2,716mAh capacity unit. It also has a more power efficient, albeit larger and higher resolution, OLED display. Despite this, the X didn't last as long as the 8 Plus in our battery life benchmark, although it was still very good, running for twelve and a half hours. That's nearly two hours longer than the iPhone 8.
So given its larger battery and more power efficient display, why didn't the X last longer than the 8 Plus? Apple's batteries are actually relatively small compared to its Android competition, but even with a smaller battery, they've fared really well. This is a testament to how power efficient Apple's processors are and how well optimized the iPhones run. It's possible that the A11 and iOS are so well optimized that even the addition of an OLED screen can't squeeze extra battery life out of the iPhone X.
The other likely culprit is the TrueDepth camera. While Face ID isn't on all the time, it does appear to be always on while the screen is in use - even when you're just watching a video like in our battery benchmark. I suspect this is the main reason the iPhone X doesn't last as long as the 8 Plus.
Like the iPhone 8 and 8 Plus, the iPhone X supports wireless charging. Apple has also informed me that wireless fast charging will soon be enabled for all three phones in an upcoming software update.
Conclusion
The iPhone X is the iPhone we've been waiting for. After three years of basically the same design, the X finally delivers an ambitious and forward-facing take on what an iPhone can be. But like a lot of first-generation hardware, it's not without its flaws. Face ID works, but it's not the finely-tuned perfection that is Touch ID; the new Super Retina HD display looks amazing, but it's spoiled by that notch.
If you've been holding onto an iPhone 6 this whole time, waiting for 'the next big thing', this is it, but for everyone else, I don't think you should be worried about missing out. Compared to the iPhone 8 and 8 Plus, the only features you're really missing out on is Animoji and a taller display that often ends up being much shorter thanks to unoptimized apps.
New things come at a price too: the iPhone X is extremely expensive. For a lot of people, that price won't matter - it'll be worth it to have the latest and greatest iPhone. For others, that price will just seem ridiculous. If you're on the fence and you're not sure you want to fork out that much money for the X, you probably shouldn't. Stick with whatever iPhone you already have or go for an 8 or 8 Plus instead, they basically have most of the same features, for a more reasonable price. And in the meantime, you can wait for Apple to fine-tune Face ID and work out how to cram all of those TrueDepth camera sensors into a smaller package.
Remember the first iPhone, the first iPad, the first MacBook Air and the first Apple Watch? They all had a lot of promise, but those first products weren't perfect. Fortunately, Apple is one of the best around when it comes to improving its designs and refining its products, and today those product lines are all class leaders.
The iPhone X is the first-generation of a new line of iPhones. It isn't a one off; eventually all iPhones will look like this. Unless Animoji is a feature you absolutely have to have right now, it's worth waiting for Apple to perfect it.
- < Prev
-
Page 3 of 3 - Benchmark Performance, Imaging, Battery life, and Conclusion
Page 3 of 3
- Next >