4G LTE Phones Shootout - The Fast and the Furious Trio
SingTel's 4G plans are available since 5th June 2012, and at the moment, you've three LTE-enabled Android smartphones to choose from. Which of the three - HTC One XL, LG Optimus True HD LTE, and Samsung Galaxy S II LTE - will be crowned the speed king? Ready, go!
Clash of the 4G LTE Smartphones
Our earlier hands-on article on SingTel 4G LTE for smartphones focused largely on what 4G means to owners of the HTC One XL. A bunch of tests were conducted, from synthetic download and upload tests using Speedtest.net to real-world usage scenarios, such as downloading an email attachment and a large ISO file.
For this shootout article, we decided to take it a step further by including two other LTE phones: the LG Optimus True HD LTE and Samsung Galaxy S II LTE. For an even clearer picture, the tests were conducted around the island. So if you're still deciding which of the three phones to get, we hope this article will give you a better understanding on the kind of performance you can expect from each of these LTE-capable phones. Before we proceed further, here's a quick rundown of the specs of the three phones:
Specifications | HTC One XL | LG Optimus True HD LTE | Samsung Galaxy S II LTE |
Operating System |
|
|
|
Processor |
|
|
|
Built-in Memory |
|
|
|
Connectivity |
|
|
|
Display |
|
|
|
Camera |
|
|
|
Storage |
|
|
|
Battery |
|
|
|
Dimensions |
|
|
|
Weight |
|
|
|
Ready, Set, Go!
Not wanting to limit ourselves to one location, we embarked on an ambitious mission to test out the three LTE smartphones at four different locations across Singapore. The locations are:
- North: Woodlands, Causeway Point
- Central: Raffles Place
- East: Changi Airport Terminal 2
- West: Chua Chu Kang Lot 1
As there were ongoing construction work on the perimeter of Causeway Point, we were unable to conduct the speed tests outdoor. We only managed to perform indoor tests, where we conducted our benchmarks at Level 2 of the shopping complex, near the Manhattan Fish Market restaurant. Also, due to the challenging physical environment at Changi Airport Terminal 2, we omitted the outdoor tests, but continued with the indoor tests at Burger King.
Speedtest.net
The first test was to determine the latency, download and upload speeds of the three phones. We used the Speedtest.net app as it is one of the most widely used apps for testing mobile Internet speeds. For each phone, we ran the app on the New Media Express server three times to get the average score.
Do note that SingTel's 4G LTE network currently supports theoretical download speeds of up to 75Mbps.
HTC One XL | LG Optimus
True HD LTE | Samsung Galaxy
S II LTE | |
Causeway Point
(North) | 62.82 | 54.14 | 68.70 |
Chua Chu Kang
Lot 1 (West) | 60.41 (indoor) 47.47 (outdoor) | 53.82 (indoor) 48.50(outdoor) | 55.59 (indoor) 50.04 (outdoor) |
Raffles Place
(Central) | 59.48 (indoor)
78.64 (outdoor) | 52.79 (indoor)
54.16 (outdoor) | 42.28 (indoor)
89.73 (outdoor) |
Changi Airport
Terminal 2 (East) | 65.34 | 53.39 | 81.67 |
The results above pretty much sum up the kind of download speeds you can expect to get using SingTel's 4G network. Both Samsung Galaxy S II LTE and HTC One XL returned the best download results, and it would be hard to say whether one is better than the other. This is because of certain prevailing network conditions that may be present during our tests. However, we've reduced much of the errors by conducting multiple download tests and what you see above are average speeds collected after three consecutive tests. Having said that, it's clear that the LG Optimus True HD LTE performed a notch lower than the HTC and Samsung phones.
Also, it's interesting to note that although SingTel says that its 4G network tops out at 75Mbps, some of the tests actually exceeded this speed cap. We were told that this would only be temporary, and the cap will be implemented soon.
HTC One XL | LG Optimus
True HD LTE | Samsung Galaxy
S II LTE | |
Causeway Point
(North) | 29.68 | 26.78 | 17.51 |
Chua Chu Kang
Lot 1 (West) | 32.75 (indoor) 26.31 (outdoor) | 13.37 (indoor) 13.86 (outdoor) | 14.76 (indoor) 12.48 (outdoor) |
Raffles Place
(Central) | 38.49 (indoor)
43.93 (outdoor) | 14.48 (indoor)
26.66 (outdoor) | 15.88 (indoor)
15.97 (outdoor) |
Changi Airport
Terminal 2 (East) | 27.84 | 27.22 | 15.31 |
In terms of upstream speeds, we can see that the HTC phone consistently triumphed over Samsung and LG's offerings, making it one of the more friendly phones for those who like to share their multimedia content. It's also interesting to note that unlike 3G upload bandwidth which is consistently a fraction of its download bandwidth, SingTel's LTE upload speeds typically clocked between 25-50% of its downstream speeds.
HTC One XL | LG Optimus
True HD LTE | Samsung Galaxy
S II LTE | |
Causeway Point
(North) | 38 | 34 | 34 |
Chua Chu Kang
Lot 1 (West) | 35 (indoor) 37 (outdoor) | 37 (indoor) 34 (outdoor) | 34 (indoor) 36 (outdoor) |
Raffles Place
(Central) | 41 (indoor)
35 (outdoor) | 37 (indoor)
38(outdoor) | 34 (indoor)
36 (outdoor) |
Changi Airport
Terminal 2 (East) | 41 | 33 | 39 |
We did not see much fluctuation in the ping tests across the three phones, although the Samsung Galaxy S II LTE's results seem better than the rest. Looking at these latency results, we can foresee many users tethering their LTE phone to the laptop for a quick game of Diablo III.
Dropbox Test
Our second test involved downloading a 20MB file from Dropbox, arguably the most widely used cloud storage service (even HTC and Samsung offer it on their phones).
HTC One XL | LG Optimus
True HD LTE | Samsung Galaxy
S II LTE | |
Causeway Point
(North) | 39 | 48 | 44.8 |
Chua Chu Kang
Lot 1 (West) | 44.2 (indoor) 27.6 (outdoor) | 39.4 (indoor) 38.3 (outdoor) | 35.5 (indoor) 29.7 (outdoor) |
Raffles Place
(Central) | 30.6 (indoor)
30.5 (outdoor) | 38 (indoor)
33.4 (outdoor) | 43 (indoor)
28.9 (outdoor) |
Changi Airport
Terminal 2 (East) | 25.9 | 34.7 | 39.8 |
The HTC One XL came out on top in three of the four locations.
SingTel Store & Share Test
The third test was similar to the second one - this time, we noted the time taken to download a 20MB file from the SingTel Store & Share cloud service which has its server located in Singapore.
HTC One XL | LG Optimus
True HD LTE | Samsung Galaxy
S II LTE | |
Causeway Point
(North) | 6.8 | 16.8 | 14.4 |
Chua Chu Kang
Lot 1 (West) | 7 (indoor) 6.8 (outdoor) | 22.1 (indoor) 15.4 (outdoor) | 14.2 (indoor) 14.1 (outdoor) |
Raffles Place
(Central) | 6.9 (indoor)
8.5 (outdoor) | 14.1 (indoor)
13.7 (outdoor) | 13.4 (indoor)
14.7 (outdoor) |
Changi Airport
Terminal 2 (East) | 7.3 | 14.1 | 12.6 |
Again, the HTC One XL was ahead of the pack.
1.6GB ISO File Test
Our final test was to download a freely distributed CentOS ISO image file that is 1.6GB in size. We observed the top download speed that each phone was able to achieve.
HTC One XL | LG Optimus
True HD LTE | Samsung Galaxy
S II LTE | |
Causeway Point
(North) | 3.97 | 4.47 | 2.78 |
Chua Chu Kang
Lot 1 (West) | 4.56 (indoor) 5.84 (outdoor) | 4.94 (indoor) 4.88 (outdoor) | 3.09 (indoor)
3.03 (outdoor) |
Raffles Place
(Central) | 4.28 (indoor)
3.84 (outdoor) | 2.55 (indoor)
3.09 (outdoor) | 2.81 (indoor)
2.88 (outdoor) |
Changi Airport
Terminal 2 (East) | 3.94 | 3.12 | 1.89 |
The HTC One XL was the winner (again) for this test. Do we sound like a broken record?
Analysis
Based on the results we've gotten, the HTC One XL is without doubt the clear winner (speed wise) among the three LTE smartphones.
The Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 processor MSM8960 chipset used by the HTC One XL is currently the industry's only complete platform that integrates 3G and 4G mobile broadband technologies on a single chip, which reaps many benefits over older processors in these aspects:
- Lower power consumption
- Smaller overall footprint that allows phone makers to design even slimmer phones
- Implementation of real-time traffic control in the software to optimize download and upload capacity
The Samsung Galaxy S II LTE came in at a close second as it kept paced with the HTC One XL in some of the tests, and even surpassed the champ in certain areas such as the ping test. As Samsung Singapore is unable to provide us with specific information on the hardware aspects of the Galaxy S II LTE, we did a search over the Internet and found two sources (1) (2) which claim that the device runs on Qualcomm APQ8060 Snapdragon dual-core 1.5GHz Scorpion processor, and has a separate radio modem (MDM9200) that is similar to the one found in the LG Optimus True HD LTE.
Overall, the LG handset didn't perform too badly (you still get very good speeds), and it even managed to outperform the competition on some fronts. What puzzled us is the performance discrepancy between it and the Samsung Galaxy S II LTE, especially when we take into account the likelihood that they are equipped with the same processor and radio modem. A possible reason for the disparity could be due to a better job by Samsung in optimizing the hardware and software components on the Galaxy S II LTE.
Our articles may contain affiliate links. If you buy through these links, we may earn a small commission.