CPU Guide

Intel Core i3-4150T review

Intel Core i3-4150T Performance Preview

Compare This
Add to Wishlist



Intel Core i3-4150T - A Quick Performance Analysis

A Quick Analysis of the Intel Core i3-4150T

Since the beginning of the year, we have reported Intel's plans to introduce or refresh the current crop of 4th generation Intel Core Haswell processors. Popularly known as the Haswell Refresh processors, the price information for the upcoming processors was also leaked. The entire gamut of the Haswell Refresh processors will consist of 27 chips; with the high-end Intel Core i7 series, which includes a new non-K variant, the quad-core Intel Core i7-4970 that has a clock speed of 3.9GHz.. As usual, the bulk of the series will come from the Intel Core i5 family. The budget Pentium and Celeron processors will form the base of the entire Haswell Refresh series, and target budget and low-power computing requirements.

We managed to get hold of an Intel Core i3-4150T processor that hails from the ranks just below the Core i5 family.

Speaking of low-power requirements, the new Core i3-4150T processor has a TDP of 35W. Based on what we currently know about the new chip, its older Haswell counterpart is the Intel Core i3-4130T. The new Core i3 chip is almost identical to its older counterpart, save for its very slight bump in clock speed to 3.0GHz.

Intel's Core i3-4150T Processor Compared
Processor Model Cores / Threads Frequency (Base) DDR3 (MHz) Integrated GPU GPU Clock (Base / Turbo) TDP Launch Price
Intel Core i3-4150T 2 / 4 3.0GHz 1600 Intel HD Graphics 4400 200MHz / 1150MHz 35W US$117
Intel Core i3-4130T 2 / 4 2.9GHz 1600 Intel HD Graphics 4400 200MHz / 1150MHz 35W  US$117
AMD A10-7850K Black Edition 4  / 4 up to 4.0GHz 2133 AMD Radeon R7 up to 720MHz up to 95W  US$173

 

Test Setup

We utilized the ASUS Z97-Deluxe motherboard with the new Intel Core i3-4150T processor. The new board features the new Intel Z97 chipset, whose main feature is its support for the new PCIe M.2 storage that offers speeds of up to 67% faster than the current SATA 6Gbps technology. We know the setup of a low-end processor with a high-end motherboard seems like a mismatch, but this is the combo we received for our trials.

Just for fun, we've also included performance figures from our Intel Core i7-4770K test rig, which utilized the MSI Z87 MPower Max motherboard. With regards to the memory modules, we used a pair from our DDR3-2133 shootout, the Crucial Ballistix Elite Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) memory kit. As they are rated at DDR3-2133, we ran one set of results down-clocked to DDR3-1600 (the officially supported memory speed for the Haswell processor) and another set of results at DDR3-2133 to see how the integrated graphics performance varies (if any) with memory bandwidth improvements.

The two AMD APUs were chosen to represent the other camp. First, the AMD A10-7850K APU (Kaveri @ 3.7GHz with Turbo to 4.0GHz) features the AMD Radeon R7 graphics core, which has 512 shader cores that are clocked at 720MHz. We also included its predecessors, the AMD A10-6800K (Richland @ 4.1GHz with Turbo to 4.4GHz). The APU features the AMD Radeon HD 8670D graphics core which has 384 Radeon cores that are clocked at 844MHz. Both APUs have native support for DDR3-2133 memory modules. Therefore, we expect the APUs to do well, particularly the A10-7850K APU for Thief gaming benchmark as it has native support for the Mantle API. The motherboard used was the Socket FM2+, ASUS A88XM-A. The details of each test rig are as follows:-

Intel Core i3-4150T Test System Configuration

  • ASUS Z97-Deluxe (Intel Z97 Express chipset), BIOS version 3003
  • 2 x 4GB, DDR3-1600 (CAS 9-9-9-27)
  • Intel HD Graphics 4400 (Intel Graphics Driver 15.33.18.64.3469)
  • Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB SATA 6Gbps hard drive (one single NTFS partition)
  • Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 (64-bit) with Intel INF 10.0

AMD A10-7850K Test System Configuration

  • ASUS A88XM-A (AMD A88 chipset), BIOS version 1301
  • 2 x 4GB DDR3-2133 (set to Auto timing for best compatibility)
  • AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
  • Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB SATA 6Gbps hard drive (one single NTFS partition)
  • Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 (64-bit) with AMD Chipset Driver V8.0.915.0

AMD A10-6800K Test System Configuration

  • ASUS A88XM-A (AMD A88 chipset), BIOS version 1301
  • 2 x 4GB DDR3-2133 (set to Auto timing for best compatibility)
  • AMD Radeon HD 8670D Graphics (Trinity & Richland VGA Driver 13.152.0.0)
  • Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB SATA 6Gbps hard drive (one single NTFS partition)
  • Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 (64-bit) with AMD Chipset Driver V8.0.915.0

Intel Core i7-4770K Test System Configuration

  • MSI Z87 MPower Max (Intel Z87 Express chipset), BIOS version 1.8
  • 2 x 4GB, 1st run: DDR3-1600 (CAS 9-9-9-27), 2nd run: DDR3-2133 (set to Auto timing for best compatibility)
  • Intel HD Graphics 4600 (Intel Graphics Driver 10.18.10.3412)
  • Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB SATA 6Gbps hard drive (one single NTFS partition)
  • Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 (64-bit) with Intel INF 9.4.0.1027

 

 

Benchmarks

We have included the Cinebench R15 for our artificial benchmarks. To determine the support for both DirectX 11 and Mantle APIs, we roped in Thief, to ascertain how the IGPs handle the game, under its normal and low pre-settings. Last of all, we tested the multimedia capabilities of the chips using Handbrake video encoding software and Blu-ray playback, with an updated version of PowerDVD. The following is the full list of benchmarks used to test the processors' overall performance:

  • 3DMark (2013)
  • Thief
  • Cinebench R15
  • Handbrake Video Encoding
  • Blu-ray Playback Testing (Black Snake Moan, Superman Returns) using PowerDVD 13 Ultra (ver. 2720)

 

 

Integrated Graphics Performance


 

Drawing from our past experiences with the integrated graphics cores of AMD APUs, they are known to give their Intel HD Graphics 4000 series competitors a good workout. For the Thief benchmark, the AMD A10-7850K Kaveri APU pulled well ahead of the rest; and we noticed that when we cranked up the pre-settings to Normal, the average frame rates recorded by the Intel camp fell into single digits readouts. The extremely strong performance by the Kaveri APU can mostly be attributed to its native support for the Mantle API. Therefore, we turned our attention to the 3DMark (2013) benchmark for a more level playing field where the top-end AMD Kaveri also pulled ahead from the rest. The low-end Intel Core i3-4150T was simply no match for the rest of the processors.

 

Video Decoding Performance - Blu-ray Playback

In terms of CPU utilization for our Blu-ray playback, the Intel Core i3-4150T processor had the worst showing because it is a dual-core processor without HyperThreading. However, it's only marginally worse than the rest of the compared processors.

 

CPU Performance

 

Cinebench R15 (64-bit)

The Cinebench R15 benchmark forces all CPU cores to render a 3D scene, and according to its publisher, it is able to use up to 256 processor threads. Therefore, we can see the strengths of the older quad-core Intel Core i7-4770K, with its HyperThreading feature. The Piledriver CPU cores of the AMD Kaveri chip weren't as efficient as the older Bulldozer cores of the A10-6800K Trinity APU. As expected, our dual-core Intel Core i3 CPU has the lowest score. 

 

Handbrake Video Encoding

We can see that the time taken to encode our test video file by Handbrake is determined by the processing strengths of the CPU cores. As mentioned above, due to its lack of processing cores, the new Intel Core i3 CPU took the longest time; a grand total of 152.3s to complete its task.

 

Power Consumption

Generally speaking, in comparison the AMD APUs, the Intel chips were more conservative in terms of power consumption, and this observation attested the power efficiency of the Haswell architecture. Fortunately, the Kaveri APU from AMD made great strides and it's able to rival Intel's power consumption stats, while delivering a lot better graphics performance.

 

Concluding Thoughts

Priced at a discount to the high-end AMD Kaveri and Trinity APUs, the new Intel processor can be seen as a cheaper alternative to the APUs. As witnessed from the power consumption test, the Core i3-4150T CPU also drew less power than the APUs. Despite its lackluster performance, the Intel CPU will garner support from system builders looking to build a budget Haswell Refresh desktop system for mundane office productivity tasks or just a simple HTPC.

To reiterate, the AMD A10-7850K APU has a launch price of US$173; while the Intel Core i3-4150T processor is priced at US$113. Given the vastly better graphics performance of the AMD counterpart, most people looking to build a good all-round system will not mind forking out slightly more dough. As seen in our results analysis, the AMD A10-7850K Kaveri APU is ideal for building an entry-level gaming system without spending more for a discrete graphics card.