Fujifilm X-E2 Review - A Camera for the Hands-On Enthusiast

Fujifilm keeps making a certain kind of camera for a certain kind of photographer, and they deserve kudos for it. The X-E2 is a continuation of that tradition, it's better but still kooky in places, yet still manages to charm. Check out the best and worst of Fujifilm's latest X-Trans mirrorless camera.

Fujifilm keeps making a certain kind of camera for a certain kind of photographer, and I applaud them for it. It’s retro done right, not just for the sake of looks, but bringing back the best of the old and mixing it in with the new. The X-E2, like the X-E1 before it and the higher-end X-Pro1, is a camera which sings when handled manually – but unfortunately falters with anything else. That distinction will either make or break the camera for you.

The X-E2 follows on the X-E1 after a year, and the biggest updates are internal. The X-E2 comes with the new X-Trans CMOS II sensor first seen in the X100S; it brings along the camera’s hybrid AF system which combines both contrast and phase detection AF. The X-E2 also sports the new EXR Processor II, and has a larger 3-inch screen with a higher 1.04 million dots resolution. There are more customizable buttons and the welcome inclusion of Wi-Fi. While we had a brief look at the X-E2 last month when it was launched, we've since had some time to test out the camera and bring you this full review.

 

Design & Handling

The X-E2 looks mostly identical to the X-E1; i.e. gorgeous. Except for the slightly larger screen, the changes to the controls are subtle, and the camera remains the same size and weight. The X-E2 is built to be a hands-on camera, with its exposure settings laid out as physical dials on the body, letting you set and check them even when the camera is off.

Manual shooters will appreciate how exposure settings are laid out as hardware dials.

Manual shooters will appreciate how exposure settings are laid out as hardware dials.

The 18-55mm f/2.8-4 lens is a stop faster than most kit lenses, and has a switch for toggling between automatic and manual aperture setting. The aperture ring, while electronic, has solid steps which pleasantly register the change in setting.

The EVF (electronic viewfinder) is the same one as on the X-E1, which is actually better than the one on the X-Pro1, with a bigger 0.5-inch screen and higher 2.36 million dots resolution with a built-in diopter. We found the X-E1 EVF bright, clear and sharp, and it’s the same with the X-E2. If you’re an optical viewfinder diehard, well, you’ll have to go with the X-Pro1 or X100S for that.

The electronic viewfinder is sharp, clear and responsive - it's actually better than the one on the X-Pro1.

The electronic viewfinder is sharp, clear and responsive - it's actually better than the one on the X-Pro1.

The way Fujifilm’s X-series cameras handle have come a long way since the first X100, but while welcome, they’ve mostly been incremental rather than game-changers, and the X-E2 is no different.

There are now four customizable buttons on the X-E2: Two Fn (Function buttons) and the AF (down-arrow) and AE (third button to the left of the rear monitor). By setting up the Fn2 button to change AF Mode, you can switch in-between AF modes (Multi, which is auto area AF, and Area, which is spot AF). Then, you can quickly access AF point selection by pressing on the AF (down-arrow) button.

The X-E2 gives you more customizable buttons, including the Fn2 button, the AE button (above Fn2) and the AF down-arrow button.

The X-E2 gives you more customizable buttons, including the Fn2 button, the AE button (above Fn2) and the AF down-arrow button.

Because you can now set AF mode selection as a customizable button, it’s quicker than it used to be on the X-E1, where you had to go into the Quick Menu to make a change. However, it still takes two steps to shift AF points if you’re in Multi AF mode, and is still not as elegant as the way Panasonic and Olympus’ Micro Four Thirds cameras let you toggle in and out of AF modes.

I harp on this because you’ll need to manhandle the X-E2’s focus most of the time. While the camera backs up Fujifilm’s claim that autofocus is now faster, it often focuses on the wrong thing. Like with the X100S, focusing accuracy still needs work. It’s almost becoming a cliché to say that auto-focusing is Fujifilm’s Achilles’ heel now, but then Olympus took three iterations of the Pen before its AF actually worked… so maybe next year, Fujifilm?

The unreliable AF is the reason why I shot mostly using manual focusing, and luckily the X-E2 makes it a real joy to do so. Like on the X100S, the X-E2 offers two digital focusing aids to help; one is Focus Peak Highlight, which outlines the areas of a frame in focus, and the other is Digital Split Image, which displays a split image in the center of the frame, when the images align the subject is in focus. There’s also a distance meter to gauge distance and zone focus.

When manually focusing with focus peaking, the areas outlined in white are in focus (camera shown here is the Fujifilm X100S, but the screens are identical).

When manually focusing with focus peaking, the areas outlined in white are in focus (camera shown here is the Fujifilm X100S, but the screens are identical).

With Digital Split Image, the subject is in focus when all four planes align (camera shown here is the Fujifilm X100S, but the screens are identical).

With Digital Split Image, the subject is in focus when all four planes align (camera shown here is the Fujifilm X100S, but the screens are identical).

Personally, I found Focus Peak Highlight the most useful, although I would have liked to see an option for focus peaking in colors other than white; I imagine that if I were to be shooting in snowy weather the white outlines would be barely noticeable.

Also, since I was relying on manual focusing, it also meant that I would take a second or so to get my subject in focus before shooting; like with previous X-series cameras, the X-E2 is a camera for measured and considered shooting rather than a run and gun camera. If you’re proficient with zone focusing however, you might be faster than I was at capturing the shot.

Other improvements include the ability to now set a minimum shutter speed, a necessity since the X-E1 liked slow shutter speeds. Photos shot in Burst drive mode are (finally) no longer named differently from the rest of your images, and are displayed together as part of your library of images instead of separate.

The Quick Menu remains one of the quickest ways to get to essential settings.

The Quick Menu remains one of the quickest ways to get to essential settings.

f/2.8 at 18mm, 1/40 sec, ISO 6400.

f/2.8 at 18mm, 1/40 sec, ISO 6400.

Image Performance

The sample photographs were shot with the Fujifilm X-E2. The originals have not been post-processed, are saved in AdobeRGB, and are copyright to SPH Magazines. They are provided for your reference only and we ask that you do not reproduce them elsewhere. Click for full-resolution images.

The X-Trans sensor continues to be the best and worst thing about Fujifilm’s X-series. At its best, it delivers pictures full of detail and color; at its worst you get odd color smearing and edge halos, and it’s no different with the X-Trans II sensor on the X-E2.

First introduced in the X-Pro1, the X-Trans sensor is different; using a sensor which spreads the RGB pixels with a higher degree of randomness than usual, the X-Trans sensor does away with the optical low-pass filter, allowing it to capture more detail and reduce the chances of moiré (we explained the X-Trans sensor in more detail in our X-Pro1 review).

With the X-Trans II sensor, the X-E2 is capable of delivering remarkable detail. But the 18-55mm kit lens, while usable, looks too soft to unlock the sensor’s full potential. Colors are rich - Fujifilm certainly knows color. But if you zoom in close, you can spot the odd patchwork artifacts which seem to be a prevalent problem with the X-Trans sensor, as well as some color smearing and halos around the edges of subjects.

f/4 at 50.5mm, 1/80 sec, ISO 200.

f/4 at 50.5mm, 1/80 sec, ISO 200.

100% crop of the previous image. An example of the color smearing and halos you sometimes get at edges.

100% crop of the previous image. An example of the color smearing and halos you sometimes get at edges.

Images look remarkably clean even at high ISO settings. I’d shoot up to ISO 3200, which is the upper limit for a balance of detail loss and image noise. Even at ISO 6400, the image looks clean but there’s a noticeable loss of detail. In the end, the X-E2 presents the same conundrum as with previous Fujifilm X-Trans cameras; do you want to get incredible detail, lush colors and low image noise but at the risk of odd rendering artifacts? It’s a trade-off that I wish didn’t have to do be made, but it is what it is.

f/8 at 26.5mm, 1/60 sec, ISO 400.

f/8 at 26.5mm, 1/60 sec, ISO 400.

f/4 at 55mm, 1/70 sec, ISO 12,800.

f/4 at 55mm, 1/70 sec, ISO 12,800.

Conclusion

The Fujifilm X-E2 is really good for one kind of user, and really bad for others. If you enjoy going hands-on with your camera and having control at your fingertips, you’d like using the X-E2. If you want something that’s really good at automatic, it’s better to move on.

That said, while the X-E2 brings some good incremental improvements to the X-series, we do wish that Fujifilm eventually steps up its game and does an overhaul of its UI, radically improves its AF and brings touch control to the rear monitor. Because while I enjoy using the camera in spite of its drawbacks, it would be so much better if they weren’t there.

The best thing about the X-E2 however, isn’t the camera itself, but how Fujifilm seems to be committed to developing the X system. The lenses are sharp, and the primes are fast. Fujifilm also seems to be listening to customer feedback more than most, and continues to update past cameras with new firmware - a rare practice in the world of cameras.

The last word about the X-E2 is the point made in the image performance section of this review. Two years on, the X-Trans sensor continues to be remarkable in the clarity of its images. It also continues to have odd rendering artifacts. If you’re looking at getting this camera you have to ask yourself if you think the trade-off is worth it. For what it’s worth, I’d easily be okay with that. The Fujifilm X100S remains one of my favorite cameras of the year, and the X-E2 is basically that minus the optical viewfinder but with the ability to swap lenses.

Our articles may contain affiliate links. If you buy through these links, we may earn a small commission.

Share this article