Results - 3DMark03 Pro (Build 340, No FSAA) : NVIDIA GeForce 6200 with TurboCache

Honor Magic6 Pro review: Hate AI? Look no further than this flagship phone

New submarine cable system connects Singapore and Vietnam, starting in 2027

Google is bringing AI editing features to more Google Photos users for "free"

< Prev
Page 1 of 16 - Leveraging The PCI Express x16 Interface Page 2 of 16 - Evolution Of TurboCache Page 3 of 16 - How TurboCache Works And The Benefits Page 4 of 16 - GPU Optimizations For Optimal TurboCache Performance Page 5 of 16 - Further Information On GeForce 6200 With TurboCache Page 6 of 16 - Test Setup Page 7 of 16 - Results - 3DMark2001 SE Pro (Build 330)Page 8 of 16 - Results - 3DMark03 Pro (Build 340, No FSAA)Page 9 of 16 - Results - Star Trek: EF2 (OpenGL Benchmark)Page 10 of 16 - Results - C&C: Generals (Direct3D Benchmark)Page 11 of 16 - Results - Unreal Tournament 2003 (Direct3D Benchmark)Page 12 of 16 - Results - Unreal Tournament 2004 (Direct3D Benchmark)Page 13 of 16 - Results - Codecreatures (Direct3D Benchmark)Page 14 of 16 - Results - Halo: Combat Evolved & AquaMark3 (DirectX 9 Benchmarks)Page 15 of 16 - Results - FarCry 1.1 & Doom 3 (DirectX 9 Benchmarks)Page 16 of 16 - Conclusion
Page 8 of 16 - Results - 3DMark03 Pro (Build 340, No FSAA)

Page 8 of 16
Next >

Results - 3DMark03 Pro (Build 340, No FSAA)

3DMark03's harsh DirectX 8 and 9 routines are tough on the TurboCache enabled graphics cards and you can see that the difference between the GeForce 6200 with TurboCache (32MB local memory) and the normal GeForce 6200 with 128MB memory is much wider than in 3DMark2001 SE. However in comparison with the ATI counterpart, the 16MB version of the TurboCache graphics card is still performing to expectations or better.

Join HWZ's Telegram channel here and catch all the latest tech news!

Our articles may contain affiliate links. If you buy through these links, we may earn a small commission.