Results - Crysis and World in Conflict : Intel's 1600MHz FSB Platform: Tried, Tested, Judged

The PlayStation 5 Pro is real and likely to be launched by the end of 2024

One UI 6.1 expands to the Samsung Galaxy S22, Z Fold4, Z Flip4, and Tab S8

Lens flare and ghosting could finally be less of a problem on the Apple iPhone 16 Pro

< Prev
Page 1 of 10 - The Path to Sixteen Hundred Page 2 of 10 - Test Setup Page 3 of 10 - Results - SPEC CPU2000 v1.3 Page 4 of 10 - Results - BAPCo SYSmark 2007 Preview Page 5 of 10 - Results - Lightwave 3D 7.5 Page 6 of 10 - Results - Futuremark PCMark 2005 Pro Page 7 of 10 - Results - Cinebench 10 and XMpeg 5.03 Page 8 of 10 - Results - Futuremark 3DMark06 and AquaMark3Page 9 of 10 - Results - Crysis and World in ConflictPage 10 of 10 - Conclusion
Page 9 of 10 - Results - Crysis and World in Conflict

Page 9 of 10
Next >

Results - Crysis and World in Conflict

In real-world gaming performance, the two systems didn't really show any advantage over each other. The 1600MHz FSB platform was marginally (and we mean miniscule) better than the 1333MHz system in Crysis, but actually lost in World in Conflict. The frame rate scores are still within standard deviation and it goes to show that in today's PC gaming platform, the graphics card is what you want to be worried about, and not the CPU or memory.

Join HWZ's Telegram channel here and catch all the latest tech news!

Our articles may contain affiliate links. If you buy through these links, we may earn a small commission.